Based on this blog post from big picture nutritionist Lawrence Haddad, "'Eat less meat' is seen as a way of improving the health of the planet and its people. However, eating less meat would harm the health of some individuals in low-income contexts, especially children under five and low-income populations...." The bottom line is that needs of consumers and producers both are different in richer countries than they are in poorer.
Friday, August 21, 2020
Why can't we all just go veg?
Tuesday, August 18, 2020
Winning the price war against animal meat
These few sentences, from Vox, say a lot: "The chicken industry has managed to cut all their corners, they don’t pay their environmental bills, they don’t pay for a lot of the public health hazards they cause. They have managed to produce a product that is just artificially cheap and hard to compete with....More important [than direct subsidies] are invisible forms of subsidization like not enforcing worker’s rights, exempting factory farms from animal cruelty laws, not requiring companies to engage in environmental cleanup, and not restricting practices — like antibiotic overuse — that impose costs on the whole world."
The upshot? Hopefully the meat alternative companies can achieve returns to scale and start getting their own products to be price competitive to these artifically low prices!
Thursday, July 9, 2020
CAFOs under attack
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Cheap oil!
This is a huge, positive development for the environment and particularly a big step against climate change. If only it wasn't coming at such a horrible, horrible human cost....
To hear more about it, including the view from a genuine expert, check out this 30-minute (ish) podcast ... and even the full transcript is included at the same link! Excuse me while I go read it....
Saturday, March 14, 2020
Enter... CORONAVIRUS!
https://twitter.com/novaaa/status/1238879131456208903?s=20
https://twitter.com/novaaa/status/1238879131456208903
Some bad news (though not nearly as bad as the real bad news) is price gouging, which in general economists support. Gotta say, though, it's a bad look!
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/technology/coronavirus-purell-wipes-amazon-sellers.html
The idea is that higher prices will incentivize suppliers to provide more of the good when a particular need crops up. For example here in Maryland, a pharmacist is able to synthesize hand sanitizer, which normally it wouldn't be worth her time to do, but in cases like this she can put extra effort into the task.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fox-5-found-toilet-paper-in-silver-spring
https://twitter.com/novaaa/status/1238879131456208903?s=20
Monday, March 9, 2020
Russia vs OPEC
A similar take from US News & World Report
Pretty much timed perfectly from a class perspective- we'll see if we get the cheap gas that this thread predicts!
